‹header›
‹date/time›
Click to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
‹footer›
‹#›
Introduce ourselves and let students know that they can feel free to contact us -- we're available as resources.
Also, tell the students about ourselves, so that they're aware of our background, how we ended up where we are now, experience, etc.
These goals are quite broad.  The main point to remember today is, however, that librarians must consider ways to integrate the use of the Internet as a resource for themselves and for their patrons.  As you can imagine, this integration poses a number of challenges and issues:
user education
computer literacy & access to machines
collection development
budgeting
Web site development & maintenance
etc.
Once you’ve done a search and have located a number of sites, you must determine whether the information you’ve found is relevant, authoritative, reliable, etc. 
Let’s talk about evaluating Internet resources:
The WWW is the whole constellation of Internet resources.  It provides the protocol for text files and multi-media.  What the WWW can do which none of the other Internet modes can is handle "hypermedia" such as graphics, moving and still images, audio, real-time chat or sound, etc.  The WWW uses the hypertext transfer protocol (http) to enable sounds, images, text, etc. to be mixed together in the same documents.  Although most WWW documents are written in the html (hypertext markup language), gopher and ftp sites can also be accessed via the WWW.  The WWW also allows any computer to become a client, and any computer to become a server.  Plus, the WWW allows different kinds of machines to communicate with eachother by providing a simple, common language (via the browser). 
A URL is an address for a WWW site.  Just as every home has a number, street, city, state address, every WWW page has a URL.  The URL is what you use to locate a particular site when you're on the Web.  The URL provides information that tells your computer (client) exactly where to go (server). 
The format is:
protocol://server & domain/directory/file & extension.  So, the URL that's on this slide tells the client to go to the med-libwww server at the boston university (which is an educational institution) domain.  The directory is called "library", and within that directory, is a page or file called home.  The html tag indicates that this file was written in the html language (as opposed to a gif (graphics) or other kind of file.)
At this point, does anyone have any questions or comments about the history and background of the Internet & WWW?
A URL is an address for a WWW site.  Just as every home has a number, street, city, state address, every WWW page has a URL.  The URL is what you use to locate a particular site when you're on the Web.  The URL provides information that tells your computer (client) exactly where to go (server). 
The format is:
protocol://server & domain/directory/file & extension.  So, the URL that's on this slide tells the client to go to the med-libwww server at the boston university (which is an educational institution) domain.  The directory is called "library", and within that directory, is a page or file called home.  The html tag indicates that this file was written in the html language (as opposed to a gif (graphics) or other kind of file.)
At this point, does anyone have any questions or comments about the history and background of the Internet & WWW?
(Based on their experience using printed resources, the students should be able to list some of the criteria used to evaluate resources.  Most of the criterion that applies to printed resources also applies to Internet resources.)
Now take a look at these?
http://www.whitehouse.net
VS.
http://www.whitehouse.gov
Which is the REAL whitehouse?  How long would it take the average user to figure out that the 1st is a parody of the REAL whitehouse page (whitehouse.gov)
Example of a questionable site:
http://www.ceri.com/intro.htm
(This is an  editorial from a supposed expert.  But, who is this guy, really?  Notice that his resume is included on the site; but the resume excludes his education and is very vague.  Is CERI a legitimate organization?)
Would you use the information  in this site?
Example of a good site:  RR Bowker's Books Out of Print  http://www.bowker.com/bop/home/boop.html
Other sites which can be used to discuss accuracy & authority:
OncoLink (http://oncolink.upenn.edu)
Tobacco Control Archives (http://www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/index.html)
Smoker's Home Page (http://www.tezcat.com/~smokers/)
Essays on the Anti-Smoking Movement (http://www.tezcat.com/~smokers/issues1.html)
The True but Little Known Facts About Women with Aids, with documentation
(http://147.129.1.10/library/lib2/AIDSFACTS.html)
Example of questionable site:
search for “dihydrogen monoxide” -- some of these sites contain misleading information:
http://www.lrsm.upenn.edu/~sherman/humor/water.html
(This site provides inaccurate information regarding the supposed dangers of this chemical.)
http://www.cis.udel.edu/~way/DMRD/facts.html
(This site refutes CDC findings)
So what other approach would I take?
One site mentions the CDC, so I’d try searching their WWW site for more information.  Or, I’d try one of the toxicology databases on Internet Grateful Med for more information.) http://www.chem.utah.edu/MSDS/msds.html  (This site sells herbal PhenFen, despite the FDA’s warnings against it.)
Example of a good site:
Bureau of Labor Statistics
http://www.bls.gov/blshome.html
Example of questionable site:
search for “dihydrogen monoxide” -- some of these sites contain misleading information:
http://www.lrsm.upenn.edu/~sherman/humor/water.html
(This site provides inaccurate information regarding the supposed dangers of this chemical.)
http://www.cis.udel.edu/~way/DMRD/facts.html
(This site refutes CDC findings)
So what other approach would I take?
One site mentions the CDC, so I’d try searching their WWW site for more information.  Or, I’d try one of the toxicology databases on Internet Grateful Med for more information.) http://www.chem.utah.edu/MSDS/msds.html  (This site sells herbal PhenFen, despite the FDA’s warnings against it.)
Example of a good site:
Bureau of Labor Statistics
http://www.bls.gov/blshome.html
Example of questionable site:
search for “dihydrogen monoxide” -- some of these sites contain misleading information:
http://www.lrsm.upenn.edu/~sherman/humor/water.html
(This site provides inaccurate information regarding the supposed dangers of this chemical.)
http://www.cis.udel.edu/~way/DMRD/facts.html
(This site refutes CDC findings)
So what other approach would I take?
One site mentions the CDC, so I’d try searching their WWW site for more information.  Or, I’d try one of the toxicology databases on Internet Grateful Med for more information.) http://www.chem.utah.edu/MSDS/msds.html  (This site sells herbal PhenFen, despite the FDA’s warnings against it.)
Example of a good site:
Bureau of Labor Statistics
http://www.bls.gov/blshome.html
http://www.eb.com:180/   
Encyclopedia Brittanica (note that it says that it contains ALL articles from the printed editions; but for illustations, biographies, yearbooks, etc., it doesn't say that it contains ALL, so you should assume that many are missing.) 
http://www.bu.edu/library/refshelf.html
Mugar Library's "reference shelf" provides a link to WWWebster Dictionary, the online version of Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.  Notice that Mugar clearly states that the dictionary is an online version of the 10th edition of Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.  But when you link to the dictionary itself (http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm), it's a lot tougher to find out what edition is contained and whether it's complete.
http://www.ahd.com/ 
American Hospital Directory clearly states how the information is gathered.  States that it includes infomration on MOST hospitals.  When you enter the "free services" section, it immediately presents a notice regarding contents, and a disclaimer.
http://www.eb.com:180/   
Encyclopedia Brittanica (note that it says that it contains ALL articles from the printed editions; but for illustations, biographies, yearbooks, etc., it doesn't say that it contains ALL, so you should assume that many are missing.) 
http://www.bu.edu/library/refshelf.html
Mugar Library's "reference shelf" provides a link to WWWebster Dictionary, the online version of Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.  Notice that Mugar clearly states that the dictionary is an online version of the 10th edition of Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.  But when you link to the dictionary itself (http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm), it's a lot tougher to find out what edition is contained and whether it's complete.
http://www.ahd.com/ 
American Hospital Directory clearly states how the information is gathered.  States that it includes infomration on MOST hospitals.  When you enter the "free services" section, it immediately presents a notice regarding contents, and a disclaimer.
http://www.eb.com:180/   
Encyclopedia Brittanica (note that it says that it contains ALL articles from the printed editions; but for illustations, biographies, yearbooks, etc., it doesn't say that it contains ALL, so you should assume that many are missing.) 
http://www.bu.edu/library/refshelf.html
Mugar Library's "reference shelf" provides a link to WWWebster Dictionary, the online version of Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.  Notice that Mugar clearly states that the dictionary is an online version of the 10th edition of Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.  But when you link to the dictionary itself (http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm), it's a lot tougher to find out what edition is contained and whether it's complete.
http://www.ahd.com/ 
American Hospital Directory clearly states how the information is gathered.  States that it includes infomration on MOST hospitals.  When you enter the "free services" section, it immediately presents a notice regarding contents, and a disclaimer.
Examples of Questionable sites:
http://www.hans.org/  (If you look at the fact sheets on this site -- none are dated.)
http://www.cc.columbia.edu/acis/bartleby/bartlett/
Bartlett's Familiar Quotations -- this is a terrific resource, but you may or may not notice that it's the 1901 edition!  (The header, bibliographic link and front matter link all clearly say 1901, but people could miss that.  What do you think?)
http://www.chem.utah.edu/MSDS/msds.html
This site actually warns you that the information may be outdated.  It also has a thorough disclaimer.
A good WWW site should be logically organized  so that a novice user can easily find his or her way around it.
Use my library's WWW site as an example:  the old site
http://med-libwww.bu.edu/library/OLDhome.html
was re-organized to function more easily, and also to match the BUMC site
http://www.bumc.bu.edu/   
and even the library's new WWW site http://med-libwww.bu.edu/library/home.html underwent changes.  See the BUMC MEDLINE link?  In the original re-design,   (on handout), the MEDLINE link is not as clearly delineated as a clickable box.  When we mounted this page, we immediately got calls from patrons who couldn't find the link to MEDLINE.  We were surprised that they didn't see it, but decided to make a change anyway.  If you compare the handout to the new site, you'll see that the links under the library's name are much clearer. Also notice on the other handout that the header and menu column on the left are small.  Patrons also complained about this, so we enlarged it.
Other sites for currency & coverage:
USA Today (http://www.usatoday.com)
About USA Today Online - the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) (http://www.usatoday.com/leadpage/about.htm)
Article by Hope Tillman entitled "Evaluating Quality on the Net" (http://www.tiac.net/users/hope/findqual.html)
Roget's Thesaurus (http://humanities.uchicago.edu/forms_unrest/ROGET.html)
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, 1913 Edition (http://humanities.uchicago.edu/forms_unrest/webster.form.html
CNN (htp://www.cnn.com)
 This site looks benign enough -- looks like a potentially useful consumer health site -- http://www.healthfront.com/  
But, it's sponsored solely by Advil.
Other sites:
     Pages Which Blend Entertainment, Information and Advertising
     The "Alternative" White House (http://www.whitehouse.net)
     The Official White House (http://www.whitehouse.gov)
     Chips Ahoy (http://www.chipsahoy.com)
     Joe Boxer (http://www.joeboxer.com)
     CourtTV (http://www.courttv.com)
Many newspapers, for example, provide what I call “teasers” -- headline or the first few sentences from an article. 
For example, look at the Philadelphia Inquirer
http://www.phillynews.com/
and you’ll see that the full text of the news is NOT available online.