Now take a look at
these?
http://www.whitehouse.net
VS.
http://www.whitehouse.gov
Which is the REAL
whitehouse? How long would it take the
average user to figure out that the 1st is a parody of the REAL whitehouse page
(whitehouse.gov)
Example of
a questionable site:
http://www.ceri.com/intro.htm
(This is
an editorial from a supposed
expert. But, who is this guy,
really? Notice that his resume is
included on the site; but the resume excludes his education and is very
vague. Is CERI a legitimate
organization?)
Would you
use the information in this site?
Example of
a good site: RR Bowker's Books Out of
Print http://www.bowker.com/bop/home/boop.html
Other
sites which can be used to discuss accuracy & authority:
OncoLink (http://oncolink.upenn.edu)
Tobacco Control Archives
(http://www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/index.html)
Smoker's Home Page
(http://www.tezcat.com/~smokers/)
Essays on the Anti-Smoking Movement
(http://www.tezcat.com/~smokers/issues1.html)
The True but Little Known Facts About Women
with Aids, with documentation
(http://147.129.1.10/library/lib2/AIDSFACTS.html)