Evaluating Internet resources
nCriterion #10:  Style & functionality
n
§Is the site organized clearly and logically?
§Is the site well-written?
§Is the site easy to navigate?
§Do the links work?
§Does the site have an internal search engine?
A good WWW site should be logically organized  so that a novice user can easily find his or her way around it.

Use my library's WWW site as an example:  the old site
http://med-libwww.bu.edu/library/OLDhome.html
was re-organized to function more easily, and also to match the BUMC site
http://www.bumc.bu.edu/
and even the library's new WWW site http://med-libwww.bu.edu/library/home.html underwent changes.  See the BUMC MEDLINE link?  In the original re-design,   (on handout), the MEDLINE link is not as clearly delineated as a clickable box.  When we mounted this page, we immediately got calls from patrons who couldn't find the link to MEDLINE.  We were surprised that they didn't see it, but decided to make a change anyway.  If you compare the handout to the new site, you'll see that the links under the library's name are much clearer.
Also notice on the other handout that the header and menu column on the left are small.  Patrons also complained about this, so we enlarged it.

Other sites for currency & coverage:

USA Today (http://www.usatoday.com)
About USA Today Online - the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) (http://www.usatoday.com/leadpage/about.htm)
Article by Hope Tillman entitled "Evaluating Quality on the Net" (http://www.tiac.net/users/hope/findqual.html)
Roget's Thesaurus (http://humanities.uchicago.edu/forms_unrest/ROGET.html)
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, 1913 Edition (http://humanities.uchicago.edu/forms_unrest/webster.form.html
CNN (htp://www.cnn.com)